Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Wed 12 Feb 2014 15:22, Thaddee Tyl<thaddee.tyl at gmail.com>  writes:
>
>> >  The following ES6 code's behaviour puzzled a few developers I know.
>> >  The results indicated below each snippet are run through
>> >  SpiderMonkey's implementation.
>
> SpiderMonkey's implementation of for-let is out of date, AFAIK.  I
> couldn't find a bug about it though.

Could you please file one?

ES6 specifies what Thaddee wants: a binding per iteration, and a "0th 
iteration binding" in case there's a closure capture in the first part 
of the head.

/be

Could you please file one?

ES6 specifies what Thaddee wants: a binding per iteration, and a "0th 
iteration binding" in case there's a closure capture in the first part 
of the head.