Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Wed 12 Feb 2014 15:55, Brendan Eich<brendan at mozilla.com>  writes:
>> >  Andy Wingo wrote:
>>> >>  On Wed 12 Feb 2014 15:22, Thaddee Tyl<thaddee.tyl at gmail.com>   writes:
>>> >>
>>>>> >>>  >    The following ES6 code's behaviour puzzled a few developers I know.
>>>>> >>>  >    The results indicated below each snippet are run through
>>>>> >>>  >    SpiderMonkey's implementation.
>>> >>
>>> >>  SpiderMonkey's implementation of for-let is out of date, AFAIK.  I
>>> >>  couldn't find a bug about it though.
>> >
>> >  Could you please file one?
>
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=971712
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andy

Thanks!

I just remembered we have a bug on for(let in) and for(let of),

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449811

assigned to Jason.

I hope this is all per draft spec (and we drop the E4X-era for-each(in) 
if we haven't already!).

/be

Thanks!

I just remembered we have a bug on for(let in) and for(let of),

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449811

assigned to Jason.

I hope this is all per draft spec (and we drop the E4X-era for-each(in) 
if we haven't already!).