David Bruant (2014-02-20T09:03:28.000Z)
Le 20/02/2014 06:39, Brendan Eich a écrit :
> Bradley Meck wrote:
>>
>> If I am reading the spec right (and I may not be), only the generator 
>> should fail? The first call to gen().next(value) must have value be 
>> undefined, and the others do not check.
>
> I thought we agreed at the January 28 meeting to get rid of this 
> error, but I can't find it in the notes. The January meeting notes 
> have missed other conclusions, though. Allen?
https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2014-01/jan-28.md#concensusresolution
"BN: Have to go back and think more about this. Maybe a helper function 
can be created."
It looks like no ferm decision has been made yet.

David
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-02-21T20:21:25.781Z)
https://github.com/rwaldron/tc39-notes/blob/master/es6/2014-01/jan-28.md#concensusresolution
"BN: Have to go back and think more about this. Maybe a helper function 
can be created."
It looks like no ferm decision has been made yet.