David Bruant (2014-03-03T09:35:42.000Z)
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-03-06T23:05:05.915Z)
Le 03/03/2014 10:11, Andy Wingo a écrit : > Of course, this can introduce time-of-check-to-time-of-use bugs. > Actually calling @@iterator on the iterable is more reliable. This only shifts the problem one step without really solving it. Calling @@iterator may return a non-iterator or may return something that looks like a iterator ('next' method), but throws when calling 'next'. I wonder if time-of-check-to-time-of-use bugs can be fully avoided entirely in JS? It might be possible to guarantee some properties in TypeScript assuming all consummers of a piece of code are checked by the TypeScript compiler. In practice, it looks like JS devs have lived well with solution like Domenic's one.