On Mar 21, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Kevin Smith wrote:
>
> `yield` is a keyword inside `function*` whether you're in strict or
> non-strict code.
>
> Right, but not within the body of nested arrow functions:
>
> function* g() { () => { var yield; } }
>
> IIUC, this would parse fine. So I'm asking whether a "yield" in the token stream for an arrow parameter list should be interpreted as a keyword or an identifier when we do the rewind/transform dance.
See bug https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2504
My current spec draft disallows 'yield' as a arrow function parameter when the arrow function is directly within a generator function.
Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140321/7dd6715d/attachment.html>
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-03-26T23:15:45.834Z)
See bug https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2504
My current spec draft disallows 'yield' as a arrow function parameter when the arrow function is directly within a generator function.
On Mar 21, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Kevin Smith wrote: > > `yield` is a keyword inside `function*` whether you're in strict or > non-strict code. > > Right, but not within the body of nested arrow functions: > > function* g() { () => { var yield; } } > > IIUC, this would parse fine. So I'm asking whether a "yield" in the token stream for an arrow parameter list should be interpreted as a keyword or an identifier when we do the rewind/transform dance. See bug https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2504 My current spec draft disallows 'yield' as a arrow function parameter when the arrow function is directly within a generator function. Allen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140321/7dd6715d/attachment.html>