Gah.. Phone. Side-effects*
On Jun 9, 2014 9:47 AM, matthewwrobb at gmail.com wrote:

And the as portion can be optional if all you want is import dude effects.
On Jun 9, 2014 9:42 AM, "Caridy Patino" <caridy at gmail.com> wrote:

`import "./foo" as foo;` certainly looks nice.


On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:36 PM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing at gmail.com> wrote:

> IIUC, the motivation for dropping the form is that it's confusing to have
> this other syntactic option which uses a different (contextual) keyword.
>
> Well, we already have this:
>
>     import "./foo";
>
> which you can use when you want to load+execute but not import anything.
>  Is that going away?  If not, then it makes sense to just add a renaming
> clause:
>
>     import "./foo" as foo;
>
> Does that help with the confusion?
>
>

_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss at mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140609/c783910f/attachment.html>

And the as portion can be optional if all you want is import side effects.

And the as portion can be optional if all you want is import side effects.
On Jun 9, 2014 9:42 AM, "Caridy Patino" <caridy at gmail.com> wrote:

`import "./foo" as foo;` certainly looks nice.