On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org> wrote:
> Would .items fare better, I wonder.
>
Or outreach to sites the break?
Rick
>
> /be
>
> Oliver Hunt wrote:
>
>> It turns out there are a number of sites (such as mobile.twitter.com <
>> http://mobile.twitter.com>) that are property detecting .entries on
>> objects, and that means that they're breaking when Array.prototype.entries
>> is provided.
>>
>>
>> We're removing it from JSC now, until we can find a way to expose it
>> without causing site breakage, although this does seem like fixing it would
>> require bringing back the awful "pretend that you're undefined" horror.
>>
>> --Oliver
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140617/d11ac27b/attachment.html>
dignifiedquire at gmail.com (2014-06-17T18:16:14.981Z)
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org> wrote:
>
> Would .items fare better, I wonder.
Or outreach to sites the break?
