Right. Would love to know the size/traffic of the "number of sites"
affected.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Would .items fare better, I wonder.
>>
>
> Or outreach to sites the break?
>
> Rick
>
>
>>
>> /be
>>
>> Oliver Hunt wrote:
>>
>>> It turns out there are a number of sites (such as mobile.twitter.com <
>>> http://mobile.twitter.com>) that are property detecting .entries on
>>> objects, and that means that they're breaking when Array.prototype.entries
>>> is provided.
>>>
>>>
>>> We're removing it from JSC now, until we can find a way to expose it
>>> without causing site breakage, although this does seem like fixing it would
>>> require bringing back the awful "pretend that you're undefined" horror.
>>>
>>> --Oliver
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140617/963dc681/attachment-0001.html>
dignifiedquire at gmail.com (2014-06-17T19:10:12.220Z)
Right. Would love to know the size/traffic of the "number of sites"
affected.
