Yes Tab, I've seen first Anne's reply and felt the urge to jump into this
worried somebody would have changed that.

OK, let's keep it here then ... <trollface>and use an offline DOM node to
simulate the DOM behavior </trollface>

Jokes a part, I've read here and there that Rick W. is going to propose
something close to EventListener so maybe this is a good opportunity to
specify such behavior in there too?

Best Regards


On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
> <andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I am saying that if your requestAnimationFrame throws mine should keep
> > working without problems as if your click handler fails mine should still
> > work properly even if added after yours.
>
> Yes, that's the desired behavior and how everything in DOM works
> today, but which is difficult to reproduce in pure ES. Boris is
> suggesting we should have a way to reproduce this behavior easily in
> ES.
>
> > If the problem is being able to reproduce this in JS then there should
> be no
> > ticket fired in HTML land and W3C since their behavior is actually
> expected
> > and IMO correct since ever.
>
> Note that this thread is in es-discuss, not a DOM mailling list, and
> Boris explicitly asked in the OP about whether this sort of thing
> should be addressed in ES.
>
> ~TJ
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140623/0ec90f11/attachment.html>

Yes Tab, I've seen first Anne's reply and felt the urge to jump into this worried somebody would have changed that.

OK, let's keep it here then ... <trollface>and use an offline DOM node to simulate the DOM behavior </trollface>

Jokes a part, I've read here and there that Rick W. is going to propose something close to EventListener so maybe this is a good opportunity to specify such behavior in there too?

Best