There is also:

import "foo";

Yehuda Katz
(ph) 718.877.1325


On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 6:24 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <samth at cs.indiana.edu>
wrote:

> Why not:
>
>     import {} from 'foo';
>
> or
>
>     import * as f from 'foo';
>
> This is assuming that there are no other desired exports -- if there
> are, then the case is even easier.
>
> Sam
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 8:37 PM, John Barton <johnjbarton at google.com>
> wrote:
> > In the module system we issue
> >    import {foo} from 'foo';
> > and the Loader computes an address, say foo.js, fetches the resource and
> > compiles it. If the content of foo.js has no dependencies, it is
> evaluated,
> > then the importer is evaluated. Yay!
> >
> > Now suppose that foo.js defines a global value. Oh bad sure, but
> sometimes
> > you have to play cards you are dealt. We still depend upon foo.js, bad or
> > not bad.
> >
> > In the current module system we have to abandon ship. In our importer we
> > need to:
> >   // WARNING pre-load foo.js somehow!
> >
> > Now imagine if we could issue
> >    include 'foo';
> > and the Loader computes an address, say foo.js,fetches the resource and
> > compiles it. Since the content has no dependencies, it is evaluated, then
> > the importer is evaluated. Yay!
> >
> > On now back to preloading somehow,
> > jjb
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > es-discuss mailing list
> > es-discuss at mozilla.org
> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140714/1e3b4733/attachment-0001.html>

There is also:

```js
import "foo";
```