>
>
> Which comprehensions? Array comps, no, but see my next mail about the
> generalized from 1 to N point, no pmap/mappar, etc.
>
> Generator expressions AKA generator comprehensions are less
> well-motivated, even though laziness is absolutely required for (e.g.)
> Norvig's Sudoku solver not to diverge. The use of () -- already an
> overloaded delimiter pair -- and the 1 vs. N problem bite harder there.
>
> Sure, we could have array comprehensions and the more general LINQ-style
> syntax+protocols together. But it's plausible based on Dave's gists that we
> won't need much or any syntax, and TC39 isn't willing to call that right
> now given how ES6 has slipped. So "defer" or "cut" (what's the diff? Main
> thing is to get to rapid-er release and ES7/8/etc. or "annuals") won.
>
>
Thanks for the explanation.  : )
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20140811/4f7bc329/attachment-0001.html>

>

Thanks for the explanation.  : )