Tab Atkins Jr. (2014-08-18T20:36:56.000Z)
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 12:30 PM, David Bruant <bruant.d at gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. Needed it recently.
> Ended up doing ".then(f).catch(f)" which can be survived but feels stupid.

And doesn't have the correct pass-through behavior, unless you've got
a switch in "f" that makes it return or throw based on whether the
argument is an Exception.

~TJ
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-08-22T21:33:10.049Z)
And doesn't have the correct pass-through behavior, unless you've got
a switch in "f" that makes it return or throw based on whether the
argument is an Exception.