Andreas Rossberg (2014-09-10T14:54:38.000Z)
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-09-17T22:00:10.405Z)
On 10 September 2014 16:52, Mark S. Miller <erights at google.com> wrote: > Why was #1 rejected? I just don't remember. I don't remember either, but one counter argument will be that it could be a performance hit. But if we are not willing to take this hit in our "own" functions then we should better not have this feature at all.