David Bruant (2014-09-30T10:56:00.000Z)
Le 29/09/2014 23:08, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
>> I certainly wouldn't object to the ES spec's event loop algorithms being
>> turned inside out (search for "RunCode" on the esdiscuss thread above for
>> an e-mail where I propose this) but that would be purely an editorial
>> change, it wouldn't change the implementations.
> The proposed setup from Allen will start failing the moment ECMAScript
> wants something more complicated with its loop.
How likely is this?

David
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-10-05T23:43:41.244Z)
Le 29/09/2014 23:08, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :

> The proposed setup from Allen will start failing the moment ECMAScript
> wants something more complicated with its loop.

How likely is this?
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-10-05T23:43:29.812Z)
Le 29/09/2014 23:08, Anne van Kesteren a écrit :
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
>> I certainly wouldn't object to the ES spec's event loop algorithms being
>> turned inside out (search for "RunCode" on the esdiscuss thread above for
>> an e-mail where I propose this) but that would be purely an editorial
>> change, it wouldn't change the implementations.
>
> The proposed setup from Allen will start failing the moment ECMAScript
> wants something more complicated with its loop.

How likely is this?