ES Discuss - Message History

Dmitry Soshnikov (2014-10-01T22:33:14.000Z)

Go to Source

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov <dmitry.soshnikov at gmail.com
> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Jeremy Martin <jmar777 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Not sure if this is sufficient motivation to accelerate the timeline
>>>
>>
>>
>> It's not about "motivation", it's about realistic time constraints. TC39
>> has already had to push out 6 months and that was not taken well by both
>> the community and by Ecma. Further delay is not an option.
>>
>>
> Just out of curiosity: what's the realistic "out of time" issue here?
> Actually, I think having a ready and working algorithm draft on github gist
> will help discussing this faster and in realistic time frames (I've
> should've done before starting this thread; otherwise, these are "too
> abstract time-stoppers" for me -- unless you know specific big issues that
> will be hard to implement).
>
>

OK, FWIW:

- map: https://gist.github.com/DmitrySoshnikov/a218700746b2d7a7d2c8
- filter: https://gist.github.com/DmitrySoshnikov/82b46f4674acee5cedc2

Does it look like a vital algorithm? And if no one sees big/any issue with,
can it potentially be considered for inclusion? I'm not gonna push it of
course taking into account higher-pri things, however, if it seems to
everyone trivial -- why not.

(Otherwise, at least it can be a source for monkey-patching the
`Map.prototype` if it's only for ES7).

Dmitry
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20141001/73444bfc/attachment.html>

forbes at lindesay.co.uk (2016-02-01T12:49:22.902Z)

OK, FWIW:

- map: https://gist.github.com/DmitrySoshnikov/a218700746b2d7a7d2c8
- filter: https://gist.github.com/DmitrySoshnikov/82b46f4674acee5cedc2

Does it look like a vital algorithm? And if no one sees big/any issue with,
can it potentially be considered for inclusion? I'm not gonna push it of
course taking into account higher-pri things, however, if it seems to
everyone trivial -- why not.

(Otherwise, at least it can be a source for monkey-patching the
`Map.prototype` if it's only for ES7).

Edit