Right, it was a typo. Consider `0xFW`.
Nevertheless the question remains, what kind of error will such cases
produce?
Denis.
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org> wrote:
> Caitlin Potter wrote:
>
>> I’m not sure what the problem with `0xFE` is supposed to be, though?
>>
>
> Right, 0xFE is a fine hex literal. One must remember all the punning uses
> of hex: 0xFEEDFACE, 0xFEEDBABE, 0xCAFE, etc.
>
> /be
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20141015/67166449/attachment-0001.html>
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-10-16T18:04:25.600Z)
Right, it was a typo. Consider `0xFW`.
Nevertheless the question remains, what kind of error will such cases
produce?
