According to 11.8.3, you'll get a syntax error – they won't even be parsed, because they are not syntactically legal.
[[[Sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity and typos.]]]
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
axel at rauschma.de
http://rauschma.de
> On 15.10.2014, at 10:18, Den Tuzhik <dentuzhik at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Right, it was a typo. Consider `0xFW`.
>
> Nevertheless the question remains, what kind of error will such cases produce?
>
> Denis.
>
>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org> wrote:
>> Caitlin Potter wrote:
>>> I’m not sure what the problem with `0xFE` is supposed to be, though?
>>
>> Right, 0xFE is a fine hex literal. One must remember all the punning uses of hex: 0xFEEDFACE, 0xFEEDBABE, 0xCAFE, etc.
>>
>> /be
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20141015/ff52d79d/attachment.html>
domenic at domenicdenicola.com (2014-10-16T18:04:15.461Z)
According to 11.8.3, you'll get a syntax error – they won't even be parsed, because they are not syntactically legal.
