Mark S. Miller (2014-10-29T20:59:28.000Z)
d at domenic.me (2014-11-18T22:35:49.437Z)
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 8:16 AM, Andreas Rossberg <rossberg at google.com> wrote: > Sure, I understand. However, my point was that in the usual private > state scenario, the weak map / private symbol _itself_ would never > actually cross the membrane. All its uses are encapsulated on one > side. So at least ordinary private state via private properties (e.g. > as part of a class abstraction) is not actually an issue for > membranes. Or am I missing something? Yes. We're talking about class-private instance state, not instance-private instance state, so one instance can be asked about another alleged instance.