Discuss
  • Message History
Andrea Giammarchi (2014-12-16T14:04:23.000Z)
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Felipe Nascimento de Moura <
felipenmoura at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> function () {
>     use strict, safe;
> }
>
> This could allow us to even add some extra scoped-options, such as a safe
> mode..
>


I'm quite sure we've discussed already other directives and the unanimous
answer here was "NO, 'use strict' is already problematic"

Best Regards
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20141216/69796816/attachment.html>
d at domenic.me (2015-01-05T20:37:23.332Z)
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Felipe Nascimento de Moura <felipenmoura at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> ```js
> function () {
>     use strict, safe;
> }
> ```
>
> This could allow us to even add some extra scoped-options, such as a safe
> mode..


I'm quite sure we've discussed already other directives and the unanimous
answer here was "NO, 'use strict' is already problematic"
Edit