d at domenic.me (2015-01-05T20:38:31.601Z)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Alex Kocharin <alex at kocharin.ru> wrote:
> It's problematic mostly because it can't be turned off when it's needed.
When is this needed?
> So another directive like "use nostrict" would be welcome imho. Especially
> in modules when "strict" is on by default.
>
//... strict context
(1,eval)("...sloppy code...");
//... strict context
> I think we should either deprecate one of the modes, or officially support
> multiple modes and provide a method to switch between them.
>
Feel free to consider sloppy mode deprecated. I do.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Alex Kocharin <alex at kocharin.ru> wrote: > > > > 16.12.2014, 17:04, "Andrea Giammarchi" <andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com>: > > > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Felipe Nascimento de Moura < > felipenmoura at gmail.com> wrote: > > > function () { > use strict, safe; > } > > This could allow us to even add some extra scoped-options, such as a safe > mode.. > > > > I'm quite sure we've discussed already other directives and the unanimous > answer here was "NO, 'use strict' is already problematic" > > > > It's problematic mostly because it can't be turned off when it's needed. > When is this needed? > So another directive like "use nostrict" would be welcome imho. Especially > in modules when "strict" is on by default. > //... strict context (1,eval)("...sloppy code..."); //... strict context > > I think we should either deprecate one of the modes, or officially support > multiple modes and provide a method to switch between them. > Feel free to consider sloppy mode deprecated. I do. > > > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss at mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > > -- Cheers, --MarkM -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20141218/14af7d6d/attachment.html>