Tom Van Cutsem (2014-12-21T19:11:05.000Z)
Adding Reflect.{isCallable, isConstructor} looks reasonable to me. If the
spec needs these internally, chances are JS developers will need them at
one point. And as you note, typeof === "function" is a common work-around
in use today. So +1.

2014-12-21 0:20 GMT+01:00 Tom Schuster <tom at schuster.me>:

> Thank you both.
> Looking forward to the feedback.
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Rick Waldron <waldron.rick at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Done: https://github.com/tc39/agendas/blob/master/2015/01.md
>>
>> On Fri Dec 19 2014 at 12:26:33 PM Jason Orendorff <
>> jason.orendorff at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Having said that, I do think Reflect.isCallable and isConstructor
>>> would be a fine addition to ES7. These places where we check if an
>>> internal method exists feel like a sort of secret-handshake part of
>>> the MOP; we should expose them.
>>>
>>> Any objections?
>>>
>>> Would someone please add it to the agenda for the next meeting?
>>>
>>> -j
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20141221/83fb127c/attachment.html>
d at domenic.me (2015-01-05T20:42:51.522Z)
Adding Reflect.{isCallable, isConstructor} looks reasonable to me. If the
spec needs these internally, chances are JS developers will need them at
one point. And as you note, typeof === "function" is a common work-around
in use today. So +1.