Allen Wirfs-Brock (2015-01-13T21:23:54.000Z)
d at domenic.me (2015-01-28T19:38:07.390Z)
Would those of you who consider yourselves RegExp experts take a look at https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3519 Is this a bug? If so, what is the fix? This construction for Identity Escape goes back to [Norbert's original proposal](http://norbertlindenberg.com/2012/05/ecmascript-supplementary-characters/index.html) Perhaps we need to add a: ``` ClassAttom[U] :: [+U] \- ``` production or some such to the pattern grammar.
d at domenic.me (2015-01-28T19:37:28.824Z)
Would those of you who consider yourselves RegExp experts take a look at https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3519 Is this a bug? If so, what is the fix? This construction for Identity Escape goes back to [Norbert's original proposal](http://norbertlindenberg.com/2012/05/ecmascript-supplementary-characters/index.html) Perhaps we need to add a: ``` ClassAttom[U] :: [+U] \- ``` production or some such to the pattern grammar.