On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote:

> On 1/29/15 4:21 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
>
>> I was hoping someone deeper into WebIDL (and with more time for it than
>> I have right now :-P) would do that.
>>
>> I missed the part of the first-day TC39 meeting where this was resolved,
>> so I hope someone who was there can speak to the WebIDL plan, if any.
>>
>
> Yes, to make this clear, I was talking about people who were at the
> meeting.  I presume that the Web IDL interactions were considered, since
> they came up in the earlier discussion.


Are you asking what to do about the fact that existing WebIDL "classes"
produce enumerable properties that probably can't be made non-enumerable
without breaking the web?


>
>
> -Boris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20150129/5c7ccdff/attachment.html>

Are you asking what to do about the fact that existing WebIDL "classes"
produce enumerable properties that probably can't be made non-enumerable
without breaking the web?