Tab Atkins Jr. (2015-01-31T17:15:25.000Z)
d at domenic.me (2015-02-13T23:46:58.947Z)
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Erik Arvidsson <erik.arvidsson at gmail.com> wrote: > Another option would be to throw. Then the caller can tell that they did > something that was not expected by the inner iterator. Yes, this makes sense to me. The code is violating the implicit contract; this should be allowed when it's harmless, but when you actually run into a situation that's problematic, throwing to the top-level is reasonable.