Cyrus Najmabadi wrote:
>
> Ok.  Thanks for confirming our read of the grammar.  Is this shown on 
> any breaking changes list anywhere?
>

It should be -- who is maintaining such a list?

Cc'ing Oliver, I believe he found a `for (var x = i in o)` use in the 
wild but it was evangelized successfully. Mike Taylor may have helped, 
cc'ing him too.

/be

It should be -- who is maintaining such a list?

Cc'ing Oliver, I believe he found a `for (var x = i in o)` use in the 
wild but it was evangelized successfully. Mike Taylor may have helped, 
cc'ing him too.