Brendan Eich (2015-02-23T19:09:37.000Z)
d at domenic.me (2015-03-06T00:51:04.719Z)
Mark S. Miller wrote: > My other suspicion: The previous failure of this proposal was before > many people had much hands on experience using higher order functions > in JS as a normal alternative to control structures. Now that we all > have, the need for a non-local escape may be more visceral. Just in case anyone wants my historical two cents, I don't think this is true. I championed both http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:block_lambda_revival and http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:arrow_function_syntax starting well after (spring 2011) the modern (Prototype.js, 2005?) higher-order function revival in JS. Anyway, however much more momentum there is today compared to four years ago, we still don't have a clear winner. But we've been over this ground. I dug up some more links in a few minutes of site: googling. Dave Herman proposed return to label here: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:return_to_label This led to (among others): https://esdiscuss.org/topic/march-24-meeting-notes#content-13 where Andreas Rossberg proposed `return from` to address the problem cited in this thread's o.p. His example used forEach, but no matter: ```js function f(o) { o.forEach(function g(x) { if (...) return 0 from f; let x2 = x.map(function h(y) { if (...) return from g return y*2 // returns from h }) ... }) return 27 } ```