d at domenic.me (2015-05-01T13:05:13.793Z)
> ```js
> var parent = {};
> var v = 1;
> var x = Object.create(parent, {
> prop: { get: function() { return v; }, set: function(n) { v = n; }, configurable: true }
> });
>
> Reflect.set(parent, "prop", 2, x); // under Allen's proposed changes, this will return false while I think it should just call the setter?
> ```
Another interpretation might be that since you've explicitly stated an
intention to bypass the receiver's setter, falling back to that setter
would be a bug.
Maybe?
> > ``` > var parent = {}; > var v = 1; > var x = Object.create(parent, { > prop: { get: function() { return v; }, set: function(n) { v = n; }, > configurable: true } > }); > > Reflect.set(parent, "prop", 2, x); // under Allen's proposed changes, this > will return false while I think it should just call the setter? > Another interpretation might be that since you've explicitly stated an intention to bypass the receiver's setter, falling back to that setter would be a bug. Maybe? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20150421/1062a1d3/attachment-0001.html>