hi, all

after es6 was drafted for a long time, i don't see any advantages from 
these changes.

the import syntax is no better than require('module') or 
require(['sss'], function() {});

and the import of class is no need for frontend developement.
the import of classes will lead to the demand of packages or namespaces.
all this only to polute the simplicity javascript has today.
And no good to the javascript developement .

I would like to suggest a language neutro interface for all languages 
inside all browsers.

so the browsers will support all languages by plugin instead of changing 
javascript into an evil language.
and the rest of programmers will use there languages freely.

javascript may not be the only language to the browser side.
but other languages can be freely imported.

thanks.

all

after es6 was drafted for a long time, i don't see any advantages from 
these changes.

the import syntax is no better than `require('module')` or 
`require(['sss'], function() {});`

and the import of class is no need for frontend developement.
the import of classes will lead to the demand of packages or namespaces.
all this only to polute the simplicity javascript has today.
And no good to the javascript developement .

I would like to suggest a language neutro interface for all languages 
inside all browsers.

so the browsers will support all languages by plugin instead of changing 
javascript into an evil language.
and the rest of programmers will use there languages freely.

javascript may not be the only language to the browser side.
but other languages can be freely imported.

thanks.