Rick Waldron (2015-05-26T18:05:28.000Z)
Silence because it wasn't a priority, relative to finishing ES6. It's not
forgotten and still on track for ES7 development.

Rick
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:59 AM Gijs Kruitbosch <gijskruitbosch at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Perhaps surprisingly, I had actually asked around and looked through
> recent threads. Apologies for not having found the previous discussions
> from a year ago. It seems that after the call for a strawman in the meeting
> notes from April 2014, there was silence?
> https://esdiscuss.org/topic/object-entries-in-2015 asks the same. I don't
> really know whether it's more useful to continue replying here or pull up
> that thread (is one month "old" by es-discuss standards?). Either way, it
> would be useful to know what the current status is, which none of the
> posts/notes that I saw really clarify.
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20150526/5ebb4dc0/attachment.html>
d at domenic.me (2015-06-01T18:13:43.058Z)
Silence because it wasn't a priority, relative to finishing ES6. It's not
forgotten and still on track for ES7 development.