Claude Pache (2015-06-03T10:38:41.000Z)
d at domenic.me (2015-06-08T00:06:49.504Z)
Le 3 juin 2015 à 11:08, Axel Rauschmayer <axel at rauschma.de> a écrit : > https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-array.prototype.concat <https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-array.prototype.concat> > > I’m not seeing @@isConcatSpreadable being used as a property key anywhere in the spec. Look at the IsConcatSpreadable abstract operation: https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-isconcatspreadable Note that, in absence of @@isConcatSpreadable property key, IsArray() is considered instead, so that builtin objects and constructors defined in the spec do not need to use @@isConcatSpreadable in order to get the right semantics.
d at domenic.me (2015-06-08T00:06:44.454Z)
> Le 3 juin 2015 à 11:08, Axel Rauschmayer <axel at rauschma.de> a écrit : > > https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-array.prototype.concat <https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-array.prototype.concat> > > I’m not seeing @@isConcatSpreadable being used as a property key anywhere in the spec. Look at the IsConcatSpreadable abstract operation: https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-isconcatspreadable Note that, in absence of @@isConcatSpreadable property key, IsArray() is considered instead, so that builtin objects and constructors defined in the spec do not need to use @@isConcatSpreadable in order to get the right semantics.