Allen Wirfs-Brock (2015-06-17T21:50:13.000Z)
On Jun 17, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Michael Dyck wrote:

> On 15-06-17 12:46 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
>> Ecma international has announced that its General Assembly has approved
>> ECMA-262-6 /The ECMAScript 2015 Language Specification/ as an Ecma standard
>> http://www.ecma-international.org/news/index.html
> 
> Congrats!
> 
>> The official document is now available from Ecma in HTML at
>> http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0
>> 
>> and as a PDF at
>> http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/ECMA-262.pdf
> 
> So is this effectively "rev39" (referred to in bug responses)?

yes, I'll be posting a change summary for rev39 


> 
> Where should bug reports on 6th edition go? (bugs.ecmascript.org doesn't appear to have an appropriate "product category".)

I've now reated a product for the 6th Edition.  The "Draft for 6th Edition" product is now closed for new bug submissions.
https://bugs.ecmascript.org/describecomponents.cgi 

Allen

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20150617/3c336188/attachment.html>
d at domenic.me (2015-07-07T01:45:29.558Z)
On Jun 17, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Michael Dyck wrote:

> So is this effectively "rev39" (referred to in bug responses)?

yes, I'll be posting a change summary for rev39 


> Where should bug reports on 6th edition go? (bugs.ecmascript.org doesn't appear to have an appropriate "product category".)

I've now reated a product for the 6th Edition.  The "Draft for 6th Edition" product is now closed for new bug submissions.
https://bugs.ecmascript.org/describecomponents.cgi