Andreas Rossberg (2015-06-30T13:55:29.000Z)
d at domenic.me (2015-07-07T02:12:23.337Z)
On 30 June 2015 at 15:39, Jonathan Bond-Caron <jbondc at gdesolutions.com> wrote: > For typeof, this would seem intuitive: A seemingly predictable name is a rather bad idea, because it would be very brittle, e.g., depend on other libraries loaded, or even loading order. It's better to have clearly non-deterministic (e.g. gensym) than something that pretends to be deterministic but isn't in practice. In fact, it might be best if typeof returned the symbol itself. At least that cleanly matches the generative nature of the type definition. If you want it to work cross-realm, you have to broker the symbol as usual.