Is there anything bad about getting feedback before reiteration? This was
meant for having some feedback and improvements. If you got some input, you
are free to join by submitting a issue on GitHub!

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Renki Ivanko <fatalis.erratum at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Everything about this is confusing; you should slow down and think things
> through more.
>
> R.
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:25 AM, even stensberg <evenstensberg at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> That's one of the reasons why GitHub is a better place to discuss this ;)
>>
>> As I tried to say, this is work in progress, meaning I'd like input on
>> this as well as improvements on the actual proposal.
>>
>> As by last line, what is it that you don't understand? Hit me up at
>> GitHub and I'll try to clear things up.
>>
>> For future discussions, I'd like to keep things such as this on GitHub,
>> so if you got any replies you want to take, do it there.
>>
>> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Bergi <a.d.bergi at web.de> wrote:
>>
>>> … was bad typed by me there.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Indeed it was.
>>>
>>> I tried to explain why I
>>>> mean that this isn't a real object by saying that it doesn't contain
>>>> prototype or constructor and thereby people got the analogy. Often when
>>>> I
>>>> say things are not things, as by object is not objects, I assume people
>>>> manage to reason without having to pin facts straight into their faces.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, but this approach isn't going to work on this mailing list here
>>> or when you are going to write a technical document like a spec proposal.
>>> Don't talk in (bad) metaphors, state facts and use precise language.
>>>
>>> We still don't understand how your `Reflect.create` is supposed to work
>>> or be implemented, how it is different from the old approach, and what
>>> exactly its advantage(s) will be.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>>  Bergi
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20160527/4c9f52ee/attachment-0001.html>

Is there anything bad about getting feedback before reiteration? This was
meant for having some feedback and improvements, not getting a complaint storm in return. The intent of ES Discuss is about discussing the ECMA/ JS language, and it seems that you forgot about that, its not only a place to submitt stand-alone proposals, but to discuss and get some precious feedback. If you got some input, you are free to join by submitting a issue on GitHub!

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Renki Ivanko <fatalis.erratum at gmail.com>

wrote: