even stensberg (2016-05-27T01:23:07.000Z)
Is there anything bad about getting feedback before reiteration? This was
meant for having some feedback and improvements. If you got some input, you
are free to join by submitting a issue on GitHub! Just to clear things up,
ES Discuss is about discussing the language, not only submitting proposals,
seems like you forgot that. The intent was to get help, not to get a
nag-storm(sorry about the use of language) about how bad this proposal is.

On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Renki Ivanko <fatalis.erratum at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Everything about this is confusing; you should slow down and think things
> through more.
>
> R.
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:25 AM, even stensberg <evenstensberg at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> That's one of the reasons why GitHub is a better place to discuss this ;)
>>
>> As I tried to say, this is work in progress, meaning I'd like input on
>> this as well as improvements on the actual proposal.
>>
>> As by last line, what is it that you don't understand? Hit me up at
>> GitHub and I'll try to clear things up.
>>
>> For future discussions, I'd like to keep things such as this on GitHub,
>> so if you got any replies you want to take, do it there.
>>
>> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:20 AM, Bergi <a.d.bergi at web.de> wrote:
>>
>>> … was bad typed by me there.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Indeed it was.
>>>
>>> I tried to explain why I
>>>> mean that this isn't a real object by saying that it doesn't contain
>>>> prototype or constructor and thereby people got the analogy. Often when
>>>> I
>>>> say things are not things, as by object is not objects, I assume people
>>>> manage to reason without having to pin facts straight into their faces.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, but this approach isn't going to work on this mailing list here
>>> or when you are going to write a technical document like a spec proposal.
>>> Don't talk in (bad) metaphors, state facts and use precise language.
>>>
>>> We still don't understand how your `Reflect.create` is supposed to work
>>> or be implemented, how it is different from the old approach, and what
>>> exactly its advantage(s) will be.
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>>  Bergi
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> es-discuss mailing list
>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20160527/61d22a56/attachment.html>
evenstensberg at gmail.com (2016-05-27T01:27:06.748Z)
If you got any other messages, please lets take this on GitHub, we avoid spamming the email list, I won't reply on comments from now on, other than on GitHub.