ES Discuss - Message History

Kagami Rosylight (2016-10-13T15:14:12.000Z)

Go to Source

>IIRC the proposed syntax for computed properties was x?.[y],

Yes you’re right, sorry :/

IMO it still seems the syntax problem is the main reason why this proposal has stalled. If not, what is the problem here? I’m curious why this proposal is not even listed in stage 0 proposal list.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20161013/27365992/attachment.html>

saschanaz at outlook.com (2016-10-13T15:19:56.927Z)

>IIRC the proposed syntax for computed properties was x?.[y],

Yes you’re right, sorry :/

IMO it still seems the syntax problem is the main reason why this proposal has stalled. If not, what is the problem here? I’m curious why this proposal is not even listed in stage 0 proposal list.

saschanaz at outlook.com (2016-10-13T15:19:34.140Z)

>IIRC the proposed syntax for computed properties was x?.[y],

Yes you’re right, sorry :/

IMO it still seems the syntax problem is the main reason why this proposal has stalled. If not, what is the problem here? I’m curious why this proposal is not even listed in stage 0 proposal list. No TC39 champion?

saschanaz at outlook.com (2016-10-13T15:18:53.504Z)

>IIRC the proposed syntax for computed properties was x?.[y],

Yes you’re right, sorry :/

IMO it still seems the syntax problem is the main reason why this proposal has stalled. If not, what is the problem here? I’m curious why this proposal is not even listed in stage 0 proposal list after years.

Edit