> On Oct 30, 2016, at 9:33 PM, David Baldwin <david.chris.baldwin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So just to clarify would the non-labeled statements be required to be before the labeled statements in the object?
if you wanted this to be compatible with code on the web (eg foo = { key: value }), yes (and, you do). But that would be a confusing caveat, so I'd go with a different strategy (new operators or keywords).
>
> May it would be better to have a "code" key that would contain all runnable code statements. It wouldn't be aa elegant but at least it would be clear
I'm not entirely sure what this means. Something like objc/swift blocks?
>
>
>> On Oct 30, 2016, 08:09 -0700, es-discuss-request at mozilla.org, wrote:
>> Send es-discuss mailing list submissions to
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> es-discuss-request at mozilla.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> es-discuss-owner at mozilla.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of es-discuss digest..."
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Proposal: expression mode (=) (Caitlin Potter)
>> 2. Re: Proposal: expression mode (=) (Caitlin Potter)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
caitpotter88 at gmail.com (2016-10-31T11:20:16.838Z)
> On Oct 30, 2016, at 9:33 PM, David Baldwin <david.chris.baldwin at gmail.com> wrote: > > So just to clarify would the non-labeled statements be required to be before the labeled statements in the object? if you wanted this to be compatible with code on the web (eg foo = { key: value }), yes (and, you do). But that would be a confusing caveat, so I'd go with a different strategy (new operators or keywords). > > May it would be better to have a "code" key that would contain all runnable code statements. It wouldn't be aa elegant but at least it would be clear I'm not entirely sure what this means. Something like objc/swift blocks? > > >> On Oct 30, 2016, 08:09 -0700, es-discuss-request at mozilla.org, wrote: >> Send es-discuss mailing list submissions to >> es-discuss at mozilla.org >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> es-discuss-request at mozilla.org >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> es-discuss-owner at mozilla.org >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of es-discuss digest..." >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: Proposal: expression mode (=) (Caitlin Potter) >> 2. Re: Proposal: expression mode (=) (Caitlin Potter) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> es-discuss at mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss at mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss