io.baklan at gmail.com (2017-01-03T21:44:54.178Z)
As I've mentioned in initial post
> this idea "isn't new", something very similar I saw in
[[async-do]](/topic/support-syntax#content-5) comment
So answer yes - it actually the same idea. However as for me ``do`` part is
quite optional and can be omitted without any lost (in this construct).
Meaning that if we will introduce different variations of so called "do
{...}" statement in future, they not mandatory should share ``do`` keyword
(they rather should only share the same "spirit").
As I've mentioned in initial post > this idea "isn't new", something very similar I saw in [[async-do]](/topic/support-syntax#content-5) comment So answer yes - it quite the same idea. However as for me ``do`` part is quite optional and can be omitted without any lost (in this construct). Meaning that if we will introduce different variations of so called "do {...}" statement in future, they not mandatory should share ``do`` keyword (they rather should only share the same "spirit"). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20170103/5533c247/attachment.html>