I do suspect most of these will end up answered in the next meeting's
notes, though. Hopefully, they do. So on that note, I'll let this sit
for a bit longer (and probably re-ask then if it ends up not
addressed).
-----

Isiah Meadows
me at isiahmeadows.com


On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Isiah Meadows <isiahmeadows at gmail.com> wrote:
> Okay...I may have misremembered the general reason (I thought I saw
> perf concerns stated somewhere, but I can't remember precisely where),
> but I've yet to see anything significant in the open about why they
> were so against it. That's why I'm asking what drove them against it.
> -----
>
> Isiah Meadows
> me at isiahmeadows.com
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Domenic Denicola <d at domenic.me> wrote:
>> Why do you say "regarding performance"? That seems made up with no evidence.
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Isiah Meadows <isiahmeadows at gmail.com>
>> Sent: Jan 5, 2017 20:09
>> To: es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> Subject: Cancel Token proposal withdrawl
>>
>> The [latest proposal][1] has been withdrawn due to [Google
>> resistance][2] regarding performance. What concerns did they have, and
>> with what parts? It's hard to figure out what the problem is and come
>> up with ideas when it's all smoke and mirrors. And yes, I've tried
>> searching for any traces of an answer, but I've found pretty much
>> none, using multiple search engines.
>>
>> Please, could I get some sort of idea what is actually wrong with the
>> proposal, what's driving them to be so strongly against it? :-(
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-cancelable-promises
>> [2]:
>> https://github.com/tc39/proposal-cancelable-promises/issues/70#issuecomment-267414933
>>
>> -----
>>
>> Isiah Meadows
>> me at isiahmeadows.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

I do suspect most of these will end up answered in the next meeting's
notes, though. Hopefully, they do. So on that note, I'll let this sit
for a bit longer (and probably re-ask then if it ends up not
addressed).