Claude Pache (2017-08-15T15:04:32.000Z)
This feature is more related to null coalescing (evaluate the RHS when the LHS is null) than to optional chaining (evaluate the LHS when the LHS is *not* null).

See https://github.com/gisenberg/proposal-nullary-coalescing/issues/1 <https://github.com/gisenberg/proposal-nullary-coalescing/issues/1>

—Claude

> Le 15 août 2017 à 03:11, Ari Porad <ari at ariporad.com> a écrit :
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Given that optional chaining is now stage–1, would there be interest in reviving this proposal? (This idea originated from my comment here <https://github.com/tc39/proposal-optional-chaining/issues/18#issuecomment-322329156>.)
> 
> Apologies if this isn’t the proper way to suggest this idea, it’s my first time posting on es-discuss!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org <mailto:es-discuss at mozilla.org>
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss <https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20170815/bb7023c4/attachment-0001.html>
claude.pache at gmail.com (2017-08-15T15:34:13.705Z)
This feature is more related to null coalescing (evaluate the RHS when the LHS is null) than to optional chaining (evaluate the RHS when the LHS is *not* null).

See https://github.com/gisenberg/proposal-nullary-coalescing/issues/1