What might be better is to extend break for named functions.

function someFn(arr) {
  return arr.map(e => {
    if(...) {
      break someFn return "...";
    }
    return e * 2;
  });
}

This way you know what you're breaking from.. super would imply one level
deep.. break already has some similar constructs.  In this case it must be
a named function or named variable assigned a function.  Not a reserved
word (break while, break for, etc already works)


-- 
Michael J. Ryan - tracker1 at gmail.com - http://tracker1.info

Please excuse grammar errors and typos, as this message was sent from my
phone.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20170828/0012a35b/attachment-0001.html>

What might be better is to extend break for named functions.

```
function someFn(arr) {
  return arr.map(e => {
    if(...) {
      break someFn return "...";
    }
    return e * 2;
  });
}
```

This way you know what you're breaking from.. super would imply one level
deep.. break already has some similar constructs.  In this case it must be
a named function or named variable assigned a function.  Not a reserved
word (break while, break for, etc already works)