Dimitrian Nine (2019-08-27T18:36:01.000Z)
dimtimeforever at gmail.com (2019-08-27T18:48:02.532Z)
Claude Pache > class consists not only of its constructor How i see it - seems all think that my idea not bad, but we have semantic hell. My thougth was Class is wrapper for constructor Object. And Async Class is same wrapper for constructor Promise of Object kai zhu >class-factories are good enough For all? Not for me - i want more clean and native methods. > if the below Browser/Page classes were also "async" And way you described - try to Extends Browser Class. How you do that? I think my wrapper more easy and simple. ....................................................................... Sorry i am not philosopher and how it be named not strong interesting me. I need functionality and how i saw not only for me. just maybe start think about how it resolved? Maybe use another name - not async, but promise_class for example? Class => Obj, PromiseClass => Promise of Obj
dimtimeforever at gmail.com (2019-08-27T18:47:52.206Z)
Claude Pache > class consists not only of its constructor How i see it - seems all think that my idea not bad, but we have semantic hell. My thougth was Class is wrapper for constructor Object. And Async Class is same wrapper for constructor Promise of Object kai zhu >class-factories are good enough For all? Not for me - i want more clean and native methods. > if the below Browser/Page classes were also "async" And way you described - try to Extends Browser Class. How you do that? I think my wrapper more easy and simple. ....................................................................... Sorry i am not philosopher and how it be named not strong interesting me. I need functionality and how i saw not only for me. just maybe start think about how it resolved? Maybe use another name - not async, but promise_class for example? Class => Obj, PromiseClass => Promise of Obj
dimtimeforever at gmail.com (2019-08-27T18:39:11.504Z)
Claude Pache > class consists not only of its constructor How i see it - seems all think that my idea not bad, but we have semantic hell. My thougth was Class is wrapper for constructor Object. And Async Class is same wrapper for constructor Promise of Object kai zhu >class-factories are good enough For all? Not for me - i want more clean and native methods. > if the below Browser/Page classes were also "async" And way you described - try to Extends Browser Class. How you do that? I think my wrapper more easy and simple.