there is possibility to use <| with function expressions:
SuperFun <| function Fun () { ... }
and it creates parallel constructor and prototype chaining.
Would it be possible to allow:
function SuperFun <| Fun () {
...
}
to use <| in function declarations as well?
For simplicity, SuperFun may be PrimaryExpression, not MemberExpression,
if problematic.
Hello,
there is possibility to use <| with function expressions:
SuperFun <| function Fun () { ... }
and it creates parallel constructor and prototype chaining.
Would it be possible to allow:
function SuperFun <| Fun () {
...
}
to use <| in function _declarations_ as well?
For simplicity, SuperFun may be PrimaryExpression, not MemberExpression,
if problematic.
Herby
Hello,
there is possibility to use <| with function expressions:
SuperFun <| function Fun () { ... }
and it creates parallel constructor and prototype chaining.
Would it be possible to allow:
function SuperFun <| Fun () { ... }
to use <| in function declarations as well?
For simplicity, SuperFun may be PrimaryExpression, not MemberExpression, if problematic.
Hello, there is possibility to use <| with function expressions: SuperFun <| function Fun () { ... } and it creates parallel constructor and prototype chaining. Would it be possible to allow: function SuperFun <| Fun () { ... } to use <| in function _declarations_ as well? For simplicity, SuperFun may be PrimaryExpression, not MemberExpression, if problematic. Herby