"to an accessor property with the attribute value {[[Put]]:undefined}"
s/Put/Set/
(I'm guessing the setter field used to be [[Put]] until someone realized how awesomely confusing it would be for both objects and property descriptors to have a field with the same name, one of which might call the other?)
"to an accessor property with the attribute value {[[Put]]:undefined}"
s/Put/Set/
(I'm guessing the setter field used to be [[Put]] until someone realized how awesomely confusing it would be for both objects and property descriptors to have a field with the same name, one of which might call the other?)
Jeff
"to an accessor property with the attribute value {[[Put]]:undefined}"
s/Put/Set/
Also in the note in 11.13.1.
On 4.9.09 03:02 , Jeff Walden wrote:
> "to an accessor property with the attribute value {[[Put]]:undefined}"
>
> s/Put/Set/
Also in the note in 11.13.1.
Jeff
"to an accessor property with the attribute value {[[Put]]:undefined}"
s/Put/Set/
(I'm guessing the setter field used to be [[Put]] until someone realized how awesomely confusing it would be for both objects and property descriptors to have a field with the same name, one of which might call the other?)
"to an accessor property with the attribute value {[[Put]]:undefined}" s/Put/Set/ (I'm guessing the setter field used to be [[Put]] until someone realized how awesomely confusing it would be for both objects and property descriptors to have a field with the same name, one of which might call the other?) Jeff