Last week at the TC39 meeting, we had a constructive discussion about
proxies (a.k.a. catch-alls).
I summarized the feedback received by the committee in a separate "Feedback"
section: harmony:proxies#feedback
Several committee members wanted to know what our rationale was for
distinguishing object proxies from function proxies and whether it's
possible to unify both. Mark and I wrote down an alternative API that
achieves this here: <
strawman:uniform_proxies>
As always, we value your thoughts on this.
Hi,
Last week at the TC39 meeting, we had a constructive discussion about
proxies (a.k.a. catch-alls).
I summarized the feedback received by the committee in a separate "Feedback"
section: <http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:proxies#feedback>
Several committee members wanted to know what our rationale was for
distinguishing object proxies from function proxies and whether it's
possible to unify both. Mark and I wrote down an alternative API that
achieves this here: <
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:uniform_proxies>
As always, we value your thoughts on this.
Cheers,
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20100201/fa707f24/attachment.html>
Last week at the TC39 meeting, we had a constructive discussion about proxies (a.k.a. catch-alls).
I summarized the feedback received by the committee in a separate "Feedback" section: harmony:proxies#feedback
Several committee members wanted to know what our rationale was for distinguishing object proxies from function proxies and whether it's possible to unify both. Mark and I wrote down an alternative API that achieves this here: < strawman:uniform_proxies>
As always, we value your thoughts on this.