Has there ever been discussion around a python-like "with" syntax?
# Till Schneidereit (6 years ago)
Ron Buckton has a proposal that's quite similar to what you're talking about: tc39/proposal
Ron Buckton has a proposal that's quite similar to what you're talking about: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-using-statement On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:40 AM Dan Aprahamian <dan.aprahamian at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all! First time posting here. I was curious if there was ever talk > about adding something similar to python's with syntax to JS. Obviously we > already have a "with" keyword, but I figure we could probably use "use" as > the keyword instead. I was thinking something like > > // Some user defined resource that can be "entered" and "exited" > class MyResource { > // Function called when entered > async [Symbol.enter]() { > } > > // Function called when exited > [Symbol.exit]() { > } > } > > const resource = new MyResource(); > > async function useResource() { > use myResource { > // Inside here, resource has had "acquire" called on it > > await doSomethingAsync(); > // Once this block is finished executing (including async) > // release is called > } > // Release has been called now > } > > Use would effectively be the equivalent of: > > async function use(resource, body) { > await resource[Symbol.enter](); > try { > await body(); > } finally { > await resource[Symbol.exit](); > } > } > > Has something like this been considered before? > > Thanks, > Dan > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss at mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20181015/9e63bae5/attachment.html>
# Michael J. Ryan (6 years ago)
I was going to mention C#'s using statement as well... though I do like the use of a symbol over Ron's proposal, I think using might be a better approach.
I was going to mention C#'s using statement as well... though I do like the use of a symbol over Ron's proposal, I think using might be a better approach. -- Michael J. Ryan 480-270-4509 https://www.tracker1.info/ me at tracker1.info tracker1 at gmail.com On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:50 AM Till Schneidereit < till at tillschneidereit.net> wrote: > Ron Buckton has a proposal that's quite similar to what you're talking > about: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-using-statement > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:40 AM Dan Aprahamian <dan.aprahamian at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hello all! First time posting here. I was curious if there was ever talk >> about adding something similar to python's with syntax to JS. Obviously we >> already have a "with" keyword, but I figure we could probably use "use" as >> the keyword instead. I was thinking something like >> >> // Some user defined resource that can be "entered" and "exited" >> class MyResource { >> // Function called when entered >> async [Symbol.enter]() { >> } >> >> // Function called when exited >> [Symbol.exit]() { >> } >> } >> >> const resource = new MyResource(); >> >> async function useResource() { >> use myResource { >> // Inside here, resource has had "acquire" called on it >> >> await doSomethingAsync(); >> // Once this block is finished executing (including async) >> // release is called >> } >> // Release has been called now >> } >> >> Use would effectively be the equivalent of: >> >> async function use(resource, body) { >> await resource[Symbol.enter](); >> try { >> await body(); >> } finally { >> await resource[Symbol.exit](); >> } >> } >> >> Has something like this been considered before? >> >> Thanks, >> Dan >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> es-discuss at mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss at mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20181017/831bb36f/attachment.html>
# Dan Aprahamian (6 years ago)
Sorry for spamming, forgot to edit subject line.
Anyway, is there a good way to get involved with tc39/proposal-using-statement?
Thanks, Dan
Sorry for spamming, forgot to edit subject line. Anyway, is there a good way to get involved with https://github.com/tc39/proposal-using-statement? Thanks, Dan On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:21 AM Peter Jaszkowiak <p.jaszkow at gmail.com> wrote: > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: > Contents of es-discuss digest..." > > I have no idea which proposal you're talking about. > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 08:18 Dan Aprahamian <dan.aprahamian at gmail.com wrote: > >> Is there a good way to get involved in the development of this proposal? >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 8:01 AM <es-discuss-request at mozilla.org> wrote: >> >>> Send es-discuss mailing list submissions to >>> es-discuss at mozilla.org >>> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>> es-discuss-request at mozilla.org >>> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>> es-discuss-owner at mozilla.org >>> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>> than "Re: Contents of es-discuss digest..." >>> Today's Topics: >>> >>> 1. Re: Has there ever been discussion around a python-like >>> "with" syntax? (Michael J. Ryan) >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: "Michael J. Ryan" <tracker1 at gmail.com> >>> To: till at tillschneidereit.net >>> Cc: dan.aprahamian at gmail.com, es-discuss <es-discuss at mozilla.org> >>> Bcc: >>> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 13:19:17 -0700 >>> Subject: Re: Has there ever been discussion around a python-like "with" >>> syntax? >>> I was going to mention C#'s using statement as well... though I do like >>> the use of a symbol over Ron's proposal, I think using might be a better >>> approach. >>> >>> -- >>> Michael J. Ryan >>> 480-270-4509 <(480)%20270-4509> >>> https://www.tracker1.info/ >>> me at tracker1.info >>> tracker1 at gmail.com >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:50 AM Till Schneidereit < >>> till at tillschneidereit.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Ron Buckton has a proposal that's quite similar to what you're talking >>>> about: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-using-statement >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:40 AM Dan Aprahamian < >>>> dan.aprahamian at gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello all! First time posting here. I was curious if there was ever >>>>> talk about adding something similar to python's with syntax to JS. >>>>> Obviously we already have a "with" keyword, but I figure we could probably >>>>> use "use" as the keyword instead. I was thinking something like >>>>> >>>>> // Some user defined resource that can be "entered" and "exited" >>>>> class MyResource { >>>>> // Function called when entered >>>>> async [Symbol.enter]() { >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> // Function called when exited >>>>> [Symbol.exit]() { >>>>> } >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> const resource = new MyResource(); >>>>> >>>>> async function useResource() { >>>>> use myResource { >>>>> // Inside here, resource has had "acquire" called on it >>>>> >>>>> await doSomethingAsync(); >>>>> // Once this block is finished executing (including async) >>>>> // release is called >>>>> } >>>>> // Release has been called now >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> Use would effectively be the equivalent of: >>>>> >>>>> async function use(resource, body) { >>>>> await resource[Symbol.enter](); >>>>> try { >>>>> await body(); >>>>> } finally { >>>>> await resource[Symbol.exit](); >>>>> } >>>>> } >>>>> >>>>> Has something like this been considered before? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Dan >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> es-discuss mailing list >>>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org >>>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> es-discuss mailing list >>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org >>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> es-discuss at mozilla.org >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> es-discuss mailing list >> es-discuss at mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >> > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20181108/64105064/attachment.html>
# Isiah Meadows (6 years ago)
It's usually as simple as just reading it and filing issues/suggestions. IIRC there's a CONTRIBUTING.md in the repo that redirects to TC39's main document, and that could help you.
It's usually as simple as just reading it and filing issues/suggestions. IIRC there's a CONTRIBUTING.md in the repo that redirects to TC39's main document, and that could help you. On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:35 Dan Aprahamian <dan.aprahamian at gmail.com> wrote: > Sorry for spamming, forgot to edit subject line. > > Anyway, is there a good way to get involved with > https://github.com/tc39/proposal-using-statement? > > Thanks, > Dan > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 10:21 AM Peter Jaszkowiak <p.jaszkow at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: >> Contents of es-discuss digest..." >> >> I have no idea which proposal you're talking about. >> >> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 08:18 Dan Aprahamian <dan.aprahamian at gmail.com >> wrote: >> >>> Is there a good way to get involved in the development of this proposal? >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 8:01 AM <es-discuss-request at mozilla.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Send es-discuss mailing list submissions to >>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org >>>> >>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >>>> es-discuss-request at mozilla.org >>>> >>>> You can reach the person managing the list at >>>> es-discuss-owner at mozilla.org >>>> >>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >>>> than "Re: Contents of es-discuss digest..." >>>> Today's Topics: >>>> >>>> 1. Re: Has there ever been discussion around a python-like >>>> "with" syntax? (Michael J. Ryan) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>> From: "Michael J. Ryan" <tracker1 at gmail.com> >>>> To: till at tillschneidereit.net >>>> Cc: dan.aprahamian at gmail.com, es-discuss <es-discuss at mozilla.org> >>>> Bcc: >>>> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 13:19:17 -0700 >>>> Subject: Re: Has there ever been discussion around a python-like "with" >>>> syntax? >>>> I was going to mention C#'s using statement as well... though I do like >>>> the use of a symbol over Ron's proposal, I think using might be a better >>>> approach. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Michael J. Ryan >>>> 480-270-4509 <(480)%20270-4509> >>>> https://www.tracker1.info/ >>>> me at tracker1.info >>>> tracker1 at gmail.com >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:50 AM Till Schneidereit < >>>> till at tillschneidereit.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Ron Buckton has a proposal that's quite similar to what you're talking >>>>> about: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-using-statement >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 11:40 AM Dan Aprahamian < >>>>> dan.aprahamian at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello all! First time posting here. I was curious if there was ever >>>>>> talk about adding something similar to python's with syntax to JS. >>>>>> Obviously we already have a "with" keyword, but I figure we could probably >>>>>> use "use" as the keyword instead. I was thinking something like >>>>>> >>>>>> // Some user defined resource that can be "entered" and "exited" >>>>>> class MyResource { >>>>>> // Function called when entered >>>>>> async [Symbol.enter]() { >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> // Function called when exited >>>>>> [Symbol.exit]() { >>>>>> } >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> const resource = new MyResource(); >>>>>> >>>>>> async function useResource() { >>>>>> use myResource { >>>>>> // Inside here, resource has had "acquire" called on it >>>>>> >>>>>> await doSomethingAsync(); >>>>>> // Once this block is finished executing (including async) >>>>>> // release is called >>>>>> } >>>>>> // Release has been called now >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> Use would effectively be the equivalent of: >>>>>> >>>>>> async function use(resource, body) { >>>>>> await resource[Symbol.enter](); >>>>>> try { >>>>>> await body(); >>>>>> } finally { >>>>>> await resource[Symbol.exit](); >>>>>> } >>>>>> } >>>>>> >>>>>> Has something like this been considered before? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Dan >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> es-discuss mailing list >>>>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org >>>>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> es-discuss mailing list >>>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org >>>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> es-discuss mailing list >>>> es-discuss at mozilla.org >>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> es-discuss mailing list >>> es-discuss at mozilla.org >>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss >>> >> _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss at mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20181108/0c2846fb/attachment-0001.html>
Hello all! First time posting here. I was curious if there was ever talk about adding something similar to python's with syntax to JS. Obviously we already have a "with" keyword, but I figure we could probably use "use" as the keyword instead. I was thinking something like
Use would effectively be the equivalent of:
Has something like this been considered before?
Thanks, Dan