Improved Function.prototype.toString in ES6?
# Allen Wirfs-Brock (13 years ago)
This is probably a good place to reference esdiscuss/2012-July/024260 in reply to your question.
Basically, these are incomplete working drafts. Much is not yet included in the drafts.
This is probably a good place to reference https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2012-July/024260.html in reply to your question. Basically, these are incomplete working drafts. Much is not yet included in the drafts. Allen On Aug 6, 2012, at 2:55 PM, Nicholas C. Zakas wrote: > I noticed that there is a proposal to improve how Function.prototype.toString works in ES6: > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:function_to_string > > However, there doesn't seem to be any update in the existing ES6 draft, as it says: > > 15.3.4.2 Function.prototype.toString ( ) > > An implementation-dependent representation of the function is returned. This representation has the syntax of a FunctionDeclaration. Note in particular that the use and placement of white space, line terminators, and semicolons within the representation String is implementation-dependent. > > The toString function is not generic; it throws a TypeError exception if its this value is not a Function object. Therefore, it cannot be transferred to other kinds of objects for use as a method. > > Are there going to be a changes to this in ES6? > > > Thanks, > Nicholas > -- > ___________________________ > Nicholas C. Zakas > http://www.nczonline.net > _______________________________________________ > es-discuss mailing list > es-discuss at mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120806/db99ecf3/attachment.html>
I noticed that there is a proposal to improve how Function.prototype.toString works in ES6: harmony:function_to_string
However, there doesn't seem to be any update in the existing ES6 draft, as it says:
Are there going to be a changes to this in ES6?
Thanks, Nicholas