Iteration of the Arguments object

# Oliver Hunt (12 years ago)

I know we would like people to stop using the Arguments object, but just to be sure, is it intentional that the Arguments Object does not have an @@iterator ?

I know we would like people to stop using the Arguments object, but just to be sure, is it intentional that the Arguments Object does not have an @@iterator ?

—Oliver

# Nathan Wall (12 years ago)

I asked about this several months back: esdiscuss/2012-December/027372. There is a bug filed: ecmascript#1114.

I asked about this several months back[1].  There is a bug filed https://bugs.ecmascript.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1114

Nathan


[1] https://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/2012-December/027372.html




----------------------------------------
> From: oliver at apple.com
> Subject: Iteration of the Arguments object
> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:36:42 -0700
> To: es-discuss at mozilla.org
>
> I know we would like people to stop using the Arguments object, but just to be sure, is it intentional that the Arguments Object does not have an @@iterator ?
>
> —Oliver
>
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

# Jason Orendorff (12 years ago)

The minutes from the November 29, 2012 meeting say:

Conclusion/Resolution

Add iterator protocol to arguments object (should exist on all things.

Array.from:

Iterator protocol

Array-Like

for-of & spread:

Iterator protocol

The minutes from the November 29, 2012 meeting
<http://esdiscuss.org/notes/2012-11-29> say:

> Conclusion/Resolution
>
> Add iterator protocol to arguments object (should exist on all things.
>
> Array.from:
>
> 1. Iterator protocol
> 2. Array-Like
>
> for-of & spread:
>
> 1. Iterator protocol

-j