On 12/03/2008, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote:
I guess I could do the two interfaces, but I'm having a hard time seeing
different extensions being made to these two interfaces (as opposed to wholly
new interfaces being invented, as was done here).
I can actually imagine one extension that only makes sence on elements
and not on any other nodes - element-rooted instead of
subtree-only-but-document-rooted queries. (I don't see any real
benefit from such an interface though, but I've seen the idea
mentioned on the mailing lists.)
On 12/03/2008, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote:
> I guess I could do the two interfaces, but I'm having a hard time seeing
> different extensions being made to these two interfaces (as opposed to wholly
> new interfaces being invented, as was done here).
I can actually imagine one extension that only makes sence on elements
and not on any other nodes - element-rooted instead of
subtree-only-but-document-rooted queries. (I don't see any real
benefit from such an interface though, but I've seen the idea
mentioned on the mailing lists.)
--
David "liorean" Andersson
On 12/03/2008, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote:
I can actually imagine one extension that only makes sence on elements and not on any other nodes - element-rooted instead of subtree-only-but-document-rooted queries. (I don't see any real benefit from such an interface though, but I've seen the idea mentioned on the mailing lists.)