A few of WebApps' specs, as well as specs from at least one other
WG, have a normative dependency on the Web IDL spec [WebIDL]. Lack
of progress on Web IDL (last published in Sept 2009 and only minor
editing since then) will eventually block the dependent specs from
advancing. Additionally, Cameron reported recently that October is
the earliest he will be available to actively work on Web IDL.
It was pointed out to me that there is still some concern about the
progress of Web IDL (understandably), so I just wanted to confirm that
from October I will be allocating some time to working on the document.
My plan of attack will be to:
finish the terminology porting to ES5 that Sam started
publish a WD
go through the mailing list archives for the time I’ve been away and
gather up issues
resolve those issues and the ones that are currently identified in
the document
publish a LCWD
Thanks,
Cameron
Hello Web Apps WG and TC39,
Arthur Barstow:
> A few of WebApps' specs, as well as specs from at least one other
> WG, have a normative dependency on the Web IDL spec [WebIDL]. Lack
> of progress on Web IDL (last published in Sept 2009 and only minor
> editing since then) will eventually block the dependent specs from
> advancing. Additionally, Cameron reported recently that October is
> the earliest he will be available to actively work on Web IDL.
It was pointed out to me that there is still some concern about the
progress of Web IDL (understandably), so I just wanted to confirm that
from October I will be allocating some time to working on the document.
My plan of attack will be to:
* finish the terminology porting to ES5 that Sam started
* publish a WD
* go through the mailing list archives for the time I’ve been away and
gather up issues
* resolve those issues and the ones that are currently identified in
the document
* publish a LCWD
Thanks,
Cameron
--
Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Hello Web Apps WG and TC39,
Arthur Barstow:
It was pointed out to me that there is still some concern about the progress of Web IDL (understandably), so I just wanted to confirm that from October I will be allocating some time to working on the document. My plan of attack will be to:
Thanks,
Cameron
Hello Web Apps WG and TC39, Arthur Barstow: > A few of WebApps' specs, as well as specs from at least one other > WG, have a normative dependency on the Web IDL spec [WebIDL]. Lack > of progress on Web IDL (last published in Sept 2009 and only minor > editing since then) will eventually block the dependent specs from > advancing. Additionally, Cameron reported recently that October is > the earliest he will be available to actively work on Web IDL. It was pointed out to me that there is still some concern about the progress of Web IDL (understandably), so I just wanted to confirm that from October I will be allocating some time to working on the document. My plan of attack will be to: * finish the terminology porting to ES5 that Sam started * publish a WD * go through the mailing list archives for the time I’ve been away and gather up issues * resolve those issues and the ones that are currently identified in the document * publish a LCWD Thanks, Cameron -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/