Discuss
  • Wiki updates to reflect last two tc39 meeting

Wiki updates to reflect last two tc39 meeting

# Brendan Eich (14 years ago)

Thanks to Waldemar again for his notes. These plus my memory were the basis of all my recent edits. I moved strawmen to proposals and left forwarding pages (in case of external links). In the course of this, I improved and tested some of the self-hosted specs, e.g. Number.isInteger. Anyone motivated and capable, please check my work:

doku.php?do=recent&id=, harmony:proposals, strawman:strawman

Thanks,

# David Bruant (14 years ago)

A couple of things have been discussed and decided related to proxies during the last TC39 meeting. Notes have been added on the following pages: strawman:proxy_derived_traps, strawman:handler_access_to_proxy, strawman:proxy_set_trap, strawman:derived_traps_forwarding_handler

Should they be moved to proposals?

David

Le 28/04/2011 12:08, Brendan Eich a écrit :

# Tom Van Cutsem (14 years ago)

We did reach consensus on these items among those present, but since Mark wasn't present at the last meeting, we didn't consider the decisions made as final yet. I will discuss these items with Mark next week. If no new issues arise, I don't see a problem with these items promoting to proposal status after next meeting. We probably also need to iterate on these strawmen in light of the issues raised in the other thread on the "receiver" argument.

Cheers, Tom

2011/4/28 David Bruant <david.bruant at labri.fr>

# David Herman (14 years ago)

IMO, writing these issues up as strawmen was a nice way to spark discussion but I don't see any need for them to clutter the harmony: namespace with extra proposals. Why don't we just take the decisions and fold them into the existing proxy proposals. Does that seem reasonable?

# Tom Van Cutsem (14 years ago)

Absolutely.

2011/4/28 David Herman <dherman at mozilla.com>